AI generated images present important ethical issues.
Remember - STYLE of an artist is not copyrightable, so anyone can produce works in the STYLE of another as long as the content is new or transformed.
Reflections:
ArsTechnica Have AI image generators assimilated your art? New tool lets you check
Ars Technica, Warner Bros. sues Midjourney to stop AI knockoffs of Batman, Scooby-Doo by Ashley Belanger, September 5, 2025
Matthew Butterick, lawyer: Stable Diffusion Frivolous, January 13, 2023
These artists have filed a class-action lawsuit against the use of Stable Diffusion and what Matthew Butterick calls "a 21st-sentury collage tool that remixes the copyrighted works of millions of artists whose work was used as training data."
Artnet News: Getty Images Is Suing the Company Behind Stable Diffusion, Saying the A.I. Generator Illegally Scraped Its Content, by Taylor Defoe, January 17, 2023
Paste: AI Art Generators Face Legal Challenges As Their Ethical Shortfalls Continue To Surface, by Dana Forsythe, January 27, 2023
BBC News: New AI systems collide with copyright law, by Suzanne Bearne, July 31, 2023
Artists' are finding their own work has been used to train AI models, such as LAION. LAION feeds image generators such as Stable Diffusion.
MIT News: Explained: Generative AI's environmental Impact, by Adam Zewe, January 17, 2025